Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Associate (SC-200)

Practice SC-200 questions for Respond to security incidents (35–40%). These original questions are grounded in verified Microsoft Learn content. These questions target the English-language skills measured effective 21 October 2026, not the exam version in effect before that date.

Q01 - Question

An analyst investigates an alert in the Microsoft Defender portal on a device monitored by Defender for Endpoint. The analyst wants to view Defender for Identity alerts associated with this device without extra integration. What should the analyst do in the portal?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

A is correct.

Explanation: Microsoft Defender for Identity and Defender for Endpoint natively share data in the unified Microsoft Defender portal without separate setup steps. While Defender for Identity monitors domain controller traffic, Defender for Endpoint monitors endpoints. Analysts can select any endpoint in the portal to inspect associated Defender for Identity alerts and evaluate related attack activity.

B is incorrect: Exporting the sensor inventory generates a spreadsheet of sensor properties rather than showing endpoint-specific identity alerts during an investigation.

C is incorrect: The Domain Controllers list configures monitored domain controllers for standalone or specialized sensors, not standard endpoints investigated for identity alerts.

D is incorrect: Connecting Okta enables monitoring of Okta cloud sign-in activity rather than linking Defender for Endpoint device records with on-premises alerts.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q02 - Question

During a critical incident investigation, a security analyst reviews a Copilot response detailing host remediation actions. Before executing the response steps, the analyst must verify which specific capability Copilot used and confirm that safety checks were performed. Which interface feature should the analyst inspect?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

A is correct.

Explanation: Security Copilot generates a process log visible directly to the user during request execution. Inspecting this log enables analysts to identify the specific capability used to generate the response, verifying that it originated from a trusted source, while also confirming that the output completed responsible AI safety checks.

B is incorrect: The usage monitoring dashboard tracks compute unit consumption, session initiators, and plugin counts over time, rather than per-response execution details.

C is incorrect: Plugin setup settings configure authentication credentials and tenant connection parameters, without displaying which capability or safety check evaluated an output.

D is incorrect: Promptbooks supply preselected series of prompts to guide investigative workflows, but they do not record runtime capability choices or safety reviews.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q03 - Question

A Security Administrator needs to configure the Identity Risk Management Agent in Microsoft Entra ID Protection to inspect newly flagged accounts proactively. The operations team requires the agent to check for new risky users automatically every 5 minutes. Which setting should you configure under the agent settings?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

A is correct.

Explanation: In the Identity Risk Management Agent settings, the Triggers category defines when and how the agent runs. Configuring Continuous monitoring causes the agent to check for new risky users every 5 minutes automatically. This directly fulfills the operations requirement for automated, frequent inspection of newly flagged identities without requiring manual administrator initiation.

B is incorrect: The Daily trigger causes the agent to run only once per day, failing the requirement for a 5-minute check cycle.

C is incorrect: Scope settings adjust timeframes, risk levels, and user groups to scan, rather than defining the recurring execution schedule or intervals.

D is incorrect: Manual run configures the agent to execute only when launched interactively, preventing automated risk evaluation every five minutes as required.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q04 - Question

While reviewing hunting query results, an analyst identifies an event showing unauthorized resource changes. The analyst needs to preserve the event with notes and tags, and immediately escalate the finding to the incident management queue for team triage. Which procedure should the analyst follow in Microsoft Sentinel?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

B is correct.

Explanation: Bookmarks preserve relevant hunting query results along with contextual notes and tags for collaboration. When an analyst selects a bookmark, using the Incident actions button allows them to create a new incident directly from that finding, making it immediately manageable on the Incidents page alongside other security incidents.

A is incorrect: Marking a query as a favorite only configures it to run automatically on page open, without preserving individual events or creating incidents.

C is incorrect: Mapping entities in a custom query defines data schema relationships, but it does not save individual event findings or generate new incidents.

D is incorrect: Filtering by MITRE tactics narrows available queries, but re-executing a query does not preserve specific records or escalate findings to the queue.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q05 - Question

Suspicious users were tagged as medium risk after atypical travel detections, but your investigation reveals a false positive caused by simultaneous VPN usage. You need to deploy a ready-to-use playbook to dismiss the risky user property in Microsoft Entra ID. What should you do?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

C is correct.

Explanation: The Microsoft Sentinel repository on GitHub contains ready-to-use playbooks defined with ARM templates to automate incident responses. For false-positive atypical travel detections, you can deploy the Dismiss-AADRiskyUser playbook directly into your Azure subscription. After authorizing its API connections, you can execute the playbook on demand to clear the risky user property.

A is incorrect: The Change incident status action only modifies Microsoft Sentinel incident metadata rather than dismissing risky user state in Microsoft Entra ID.

B is incorrect: Cloning duplicates an existing logic app and Run Trigger executes it, but neither option deploys the required risky user remediation template.

D is incorrect: Exporting transfers a logic app definition to Power Automate rather than acquiring or deploying the Microsoft Entra risk dismissal playbook.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q06 - Question

A team builds an assistant that must answer questions about its organization's expenses policy. Without extra data, the model returns generic answers that tell users to consult policy documents. Which change produces more relevant answers?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

B is correct.

Explanation: Retrieval augmented generation retrieves relevant information from sources such as policy documents and augments the user prompt with that data. By supplying this specific context alongside the question, the language model can generate responses grounded in organizational policy rather than returning generic guidance telling users to review external documentation.

A is incorrect: System prompts establish overall tone and behavior constraints, but adjusting style cannot supply the missing expense policy documentation to the model.

C is incorrect: Submitting longer questions without factual reference data still leaves the model without the policy text needed to ground its responses.

D is incorrect: Conversation history maintains multi-turn context across queries, and deleting it eliminates conversational continuity without adding any relevant policy context.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q07 - Question

During an investigation involving Teams chats, external counsel requires exported chat messages formatted as readable transcripts, along with up to 12 hours of surrounding conversational context for each match. Which export settings should you configure for Exchange and Teams content?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

B is correct.

Explanation: For Exchange and Teams content, selecting Thread conversations packages chat messages into HTML transcripts for conversational review. Additionally, choosing to include contextual Teams and Viva Engage messages incorporates up to 12 hours of surrounding related conversation. Together, these specific mailbox and Teams export settings fulfill counsel's exact requirements for formatted readable transcripts and conversational context.

A is incorrect: Exporting content as PST files and retaining original folder paths configures format packaging, but neither creates transcripts nor includes conversational context.

C is incorrect: Exporting partially indexed items and organizing by source location manages unindexed data and directory structures rather than conversational message context.

D is incorrect: Exporting document versions and non-matching subfolder items represents OneDrive and SharePoint export settings rather than Teams chat transcript configurations.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q08 - Question

A security operations team receives multiple Defender for Endpoint alerts that share attack techniques or originate from the same attacker. Analysts must investigate and respond to these related alerts collectively rather than individually. Which entity should they investigate?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

C is correct.

Explanation: In Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, alerts with the same attack techniques or attributed to the same attacker are aggregated into an incident. This aggregation allows security analysts to understand the full scope of a breach and collectively investigate and respond to related threats instead of processing alerts individually.

A is incorrect: Security recommendations highlight organizational exposure and configuration weaknesses to remediate rather than grouping detected alert activity for collective incident response.

B is incorrect: Automated investigations use inspection playbooks to examine and remediate alerts automatically rather than acting as the entity aggregating related attacker alerts.

D is incorrect: Attack surface reduction rules prevent malicious Office and script behaviors rather than serving as the analytical entity that aggregates related alerts.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q09 - Question

A security operations analyst identifies a vulnerable application in Microsoft Defender portal and submits a remediation request. Several hours later, the analyst observes that the application remains unpatched on all target devices. What explains why submitting the remediation request did not automatically modify or patch the affected endpoints?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

A is correct.

Explanation: Submitting a remediation request creates a tracking activity item within vulnerability management and generates a corresponding remediation ticket in Microsoft Intune. Crucially, submitting this request does not automatically trigger remediation or apply any changes to devices; instead, the IT administrator must log into Microsoft Intune to approve or reject the request and start a package deployment.

B is incorrect: The Weaknesses page catalogs CVE vulnerability details, and remediation workflows never require an analyst to manually update weakness entries.

C is incorrect: Remediation forms allow selecting applicable device groups, but submitting a request never applies changes or deploys updates to any endpoints.

D is incorrect: Due dates establish administrative deadlines, and omitting one cannot cause failure because request submissions never trigger automated endpoint patching.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Q10 - Question

An investigator finishes reviewing an insider risk case and sends an email notice to the user to reinforce corporate policy. The investigator notices the case remains in the Active status. Which action must the investigator take to transition the case status to Closed?

Domain: Respond to security incidents (35–40%) Type: Single choice

A is correct.

Explanation: Sending an email notice does not close an insider risk case in Microsoft Purview. To change the case status to Closed, the investigator must explicitly select Resolve case and assign a classification of Benign or Confirmed policy violation. This operational action records the reason and logs resolution details into Case notes.

B is incorrect: Escalating to Microsoft Purview eDiscovery (Premium) transfers the case for legal hold and deeper investigation, leaving the case unresolved.

C is incorrect: The notice is logged in Case notes automatically, but recording this communication does not transition the case to Closed status.

D is incorrect: Running a Power Automate flow automates external notifications or ticket generation, but it does not resolve or close the case.

Learn more in Microsoft Learn

Take the SC-200 practice test · Read the SC-200 study guide